Qualified inquiries by practice area
Not how many people contacted the firm—how many were the kind of matter you wanted.
Industries · Legal
Digital consulting for law firms and solo attorneys
Almost nobody contacts a law firm casually. Something has happened, it is usually urgent, and it is often embarrassing—so the searching happens privately, late, and in the words of the problem rather than the words of the profession. We help firms be present for those searches and answer the people who follow them.
The buying journey
How someone gets from a problem to your firm
The research is short, private, and anxious—which makes it very different from most professional services:
-
They search the situation, not the practice area
“Can I keep my car if I file,” “what happens after I’m served.” People describe what is happening to them, not the legal category it belongs to. Firms write in the category.
-
They read to find out whether it’s as bad as they think
Before choosing anyone, they want to know the shape of the process. The firm that answers that question plainly earns the call, because it has already been useful once.
-
They contact more than one firm
Usually several, often in one sitting, and usually outside business hours. Nobody researching a legal problem at eleven at night waits patiently for Monday.
-
Intake decides it
How quickly and how humanely that first contact is handled reads, fairly or not, as a preview of how the matter itself will be handled.
Sound familiar?
- People ask search engines and AI tools exactly the questions your firm answers for a living—and your firm isn’t in the answer.
- Your content is accurate but written for peers, not for how a worried person searches.
- Inquiries arrive after hours and sit until morning, by which point they’ve hired someone else.
- The inquiries that do come in aren’t the matters you want more of.
- Nobody can say which practice areas the website is actually producing work for.
Where we'd usually start
A fixed-price baseline audit shows where the firm stands for the situational questions that come before anyone contacts a lawyer—what you rank for, what AI tools currently answer, and which practice areas have no presence at all. You get a prioritized plan you could hand to anyone.
SEO & AEOOften alongside or after
- Content Strategy The practice-area writing, once the audit shows where it earns its keep.
- AI Automation After-hours acknowledgement and intake routing—no advice, no promises, just a human next step.
- Google Business Profile Often the fastest visible improvement for a firm serving a specific area.
Compliance
Content that informs without practicing
Advertising rules for attorneys are real, and the line between informing and advising matters. How we handle it:
How the content works
- Written to inform: plain explanations of processes, options, and the questions worth asking
- Structured for how people research—direct answers, FAQs, definitions with sources
- Reviewed by your firm before anything publishes; you hold the final word on everything practice-specific
- Attributed and dated, so the authority being built is traceably yours
What it never does
- Give legal advice, or invite anyone to rely on it as advice
- Promise outcomes, results, or timelines for matters
- Make comparative claims about other firms
- Publish anything your review hasn’t seen
This isn’t only caution—content that respects the line reads as more credible to exactly the clients you want.
Not sure any of this is your actual problem?
Tell us what's happening in your business and we'll tell you where we would look first. If the answer is that nothing needs doing yet, you'll hear that instead.
Fit
Is this a good match?
Likely a fit if
- Your practice areas are ones people search in plain language when something has gone wrong.
- You want the website to produce specific kinds of matters, not simply more of everything.
- You want anything practice-specific reviewed by your firm before it publishes—that is how we prefer to work anyway.
Probably not if
- You want content written and published without firm review. We won’t work that way in a regulated field.
- You need someone to advise on advertising-rule compliance itself—we write to the line and flag questions, but your bar’s rules are your counsel’s call.
First look
What we'd inspect first
-
The situational questions that precede a call
The plain-language questions people search and ask AI tools about the problems you handle—and who currently owns those answers.
-
How your existing content answers them
Firms often have accurate content that is invisible: written for peers, buried in a PDF, or structured so no search system can use it.
-
The intake path, walked like a stranger
We’d contact the firm the way an anxious person would, including on an evening and a weekend, and note exactly what happens and how long it takes.
-
Which matters your presence currently invites
Whether what comes in matches the practice areas you want to grow. Misaligned visibility produces busy weeks rather than better ones.
-
Consistency across your professional footprint
Google profile, bar and directory listings, and your site—whether they agree with each other and are current.
Measurement See our impact and measurement framework
How we'd measure progress
For a firm, volume is the wrong measure and fit is the right one. We baseline these and report movement in context, without promising outcomes:
Time to first human response
Measured on a weekday and on a Saturday night, because that is when a good share of this research happens.
Visibility for the situational questions
Where you stand in search results and AI answers for the questions that come before a hire.
Content coverage
Which of the real pre-engagement questions have a genuine answer on your site, and which still lead nowhere.
Common questions
-
Yes, and they vary by state bar. Content is written to inform rather than to advise, avoids outcome claims and comparisons to other firms, and is reviewed by your firm before publishing. Where something is genuinely a rules question, we flag it rather than guess.
-
People increasingly ask AI tools about their situation before contacting an attorney. Direct answers, structured FAQ content, schema markup, and clear sourcing are what position a firm to appear in those answers rather than being summarized around.
-
An automated acknowledgement that gives no advice and promises nothing, but confirms a real person will follow up and says when. It is a small build and usually the highest-return thing available, because the alternative is silence during the hours people are most anxious.
-
Yes. Practice-area pages written in the language people search, with proper structure and schema, are where most of the useful ground is in legal search.
-
Yes. Solo attorneys and small firms are where this work fits best—the scope stays proportional and the difference is visible.
-
The baseline audit is fixed-price with a defined deliverable. Content work is scoped monthly and continues only while the plan still has topics worth writing—we’ll say so when it stops earning its fee.